LeagueLab.cc

LeagueLab is not endorsed by Riot Games and does not reflect the views or opinions of Riot Games or anyone officially involved in producing or managing League of Legends. League of Legends and Riot Games are trademarks or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc. League of Legends © Riot Games, Inc.

© 2026 LeagueLab|Contact/Feedback: [email protected]|Weekly reports|About|Metrics Guide|Glossary|Privacy Policy|Terms of Use|Contact

WeeklyTeamsLeague TeamsLeague PlayersChampion StatsBan/PickChampion Builds
LCPLCP 2026 Split 1 Playoffs2026-02-13Patch 16.327:19
GZGZGZGZGZGround Zero GamingGround Zero GamingL
5:22
CFOCFOCFOCFOCFOCTBC Flying OysterCTBC Flying OysterW

Ground Zero Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster — a LCP match played on 2026-02-13, and the win went to CTBC Flying Oyster. 27 combined kills over 27:19 places this game inside the usual league range. The figures below are not skewed toward any single phase of the game. The total gold gap grew to 16,047, with CTBC Flying Oyster ahead. At that size the item tiers differ, so the late-game combat figures should be read as numbers produced after the gap opened. CTBC Flying Oyster finished with 9 on Towers against 0 for the opponent — the widest objective gap in this game.

A KDA of 10/1/8 is what Doggo recorded on Ashe, the strongest line among the winners. In the Bot matchup, Doggo finished 5,522 gold ahead of Shunn. This compares end-of-game totals for the same position, so it is not a laning-phase figure on its own. The draft started with Ground Zero Gaming removing Azir and CTBC Flying Oyster removing Dr. Mundo. Those first two cards set the direction of the draft. On patch 16.3, this counts as game 3 within a series of 4.

Game 1Game 2Game 3Game 4
GameFull StatsSeries SummaryBuildsTimelinePreview

Recent games — both teams

GZGZGZGround Zero GamingGround Zero GamingTeam analysis
CFOCFOCFOCTBC Flying OysterCTBC Flying OysterTeam analysis
LCP standingsLCP champion statsRecent games feed