LeagueLab.cc

LeagueLab is not endorsed by Riot Games and does not reflect the views or opinions of Riot Games or anyone officially involved in producing or managing League of Legends. League of Legends and Riot Games are trademarks or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc. League of Legends © Riot Games, Inc.

© 2026 LeagueLab|Contact/Feedback: [email protected]|Weekly reports|About|Metrics Guide|Glossary|Privacy Policy|Terms of Use|Contact

WeeklyTeamsLeague TeamsLeague PlayersChampion StatsBan/PickChampion Builds
TCLTCL 2026 Summer2026-07-30Patch 16.1432:50
DPDPDPDPDPDark PassageDark PassageL
18:28
SHASHASHAShark AttackShark AttackW

Shark Attack took this one. It was a TCL fixture played on 2026-07-30 between Dark Passage and Shark Attack. The two teams combined for 46 kills, so this was a fight-heavy game. Over 32:50 of play, that many kills means the KDA below reflects teamfight participation more than lane advantage. Shark Attack finished 5,245 gold ahead. That is not an unrecoverable gap, so the objective and combat figures below show where the game actually turned. Dark Passage finished with 3 on Voidgrubs against 0 for the opponent — the widest objective gap in this game.

Looking at Sangrod, the pick was Mordekaiser and the line reads 9/3/12. The gold and damage share in the scoreboard show what kind of game it was. In the Top matchup, Sangrod finished 5,499 gold ahead of fabFabulous. This compares end-of-game totals for the same position, so it is not a laning-phase figure on its own. The draft started with Dark Passage removing Olaf and Shark Attack removing Camille. Those first two cards set the direction of the draft. On patch 16.14, this counts as game 2 within a series of 3.

Game 1Game 2Game 3
GameFull StatsSeries SummaryBuildsTimelinePreview

Recent games — both teams

DPDPDPDark PassageDark PassageTeam analysis
SHASHAShark AttackShark AttackTeam analysis
TCL standingsTCL champion statsRecent games feed