LeagueLab.cc

LeagueLab is not endorsed by Riot Games and does not reflect the views or opinions of Riot Games or anyone officially involved in producing or managing League of Legends. League of Legends and Riot Games are trademarks or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc. League of Legends © Riot Games, Inc.

© 2026 LeagueLab|Contact/Feedback: [email protected]|Weekly reports|About|Metrics Guide|Glossary|Privacy Policy|Terms of Use|Contact

WeeklyTeamsLeague TeamsLeague PlayersChampion StatsBan/PickChampion Builds
EWCEsports World Cup 2026 Online Qualifier: Asia-Pacific2026-05-06Patch 16.932:41
CFOCFOCFOCFOCFOCTBC Flying OysterCTBC Flying OysterL
13:24
GZGZGZGZGZGround Zero GamingGround Zero GamingW

CTBC Flying Oyster vs Ground Zero Gaming — a EWC match played on 2026-05-06, and the win went to Ground Zero Gaming. 37 combined kills over 32:41 places this game inside the usual league range. The figures below are not skewed toward any single phase of the game. Ground Zero Gaming finished 5,944 gold ahead. That is not an unrecoverable gap, so the objective and combat figures below show where the game actually turned. Ground Zero Gaming finished with 4 on Dragons against 1 for the opponent — the widest objective gap in this game.

Looking at Husha, the pick was Naafiri and the line reads 10/2/9. The gold and damage share in the scoreboard show what kind of game it was. In the Jungle matchup, Husha finished 3,622 gold ahead of Shad0w. This compares end-of-game totals for the same position, so it is not a laning-phase figure on its own. Bard was the first champion CTBC Flying Oyster removed, while the opening ban from Ground Zero Gaming was Rumble. Game 1 of the series. The series ran to 3 games in total, and the patch applied was 16.9.

Game 1Game 2Game 3
GameFull StatsSeries SummaryBuildsTimelinePreview

Recent games — both teams

CFOCFOCFOCTBC Flying OysterCTBC Flying OysterTeam analysis
GZGZGZGround Zero GamingGround Zero GamingTeam analysis
EWC standingsEWC champion statsRecent games feed